By Dr. Jude Fokwang
Indeed, many Cameroonians do not understand why the Youth Day is celebrated on February 11, the date on which a plebiscite was held in the former British Cameroons, aimed at deciding its fate - gain independence by integrating with the Federal Republic of Nigeria or the already independent French Cameroon - despite strong support for a third option.
On February 11, 1961, the Southern British Cameroons opted to join French Cameroon while their counterparts in the North cast their votes in favour of joining the Nigerian Federation. Many contemporary Anglophone activists regret this decision.
Few Anglophone Cameroonians contest the validity of the claim that the former British Southern Cameroons (known after 1961 as the State of West Cameroon) has suffered a raw deal from its unification with French Cameroon since 1961.
However, resentment against Francophone domination has led to false charges among certain quarters about the origins of the National Youth Day in Cameroon. An issue, some of them have argued, is the claim that the replacement of the Plebiscite Day with the Youth Day was masterminded by Francophone leaders with the specific intention of eroding Anglophone Cameroon's historical legacy.
This charge is ill-founded and belied by archival evidence as will be seen shortly. The fact that many Anglophone youths acknowledge their ignorance of the origins of the Youth Day is often pointed as evidence of Francophone-engineered erosion or distortion of history - the product of which is collective amnesia for present and future generations of Anglophone Cameroonians.
Drawing on archival research conducted at the Bamenda Archives in 2006, this article provides a brief but lucid account of the specific origins of the Youth Day, which I argue, constitutes one of West Cameroon's contributions to national political ritual.
From "National Day" To Youth Day
The Youth Day was an initiative of the West Cameroon government, introduced initially to replace its "national day" which prior to reunification was celebrated every 26 October. It is not evident from archival sources why 26 October was considered a national day, but it is probable that it was the local date on which Empire Day was celebrated in the British trust-territory.
In 1962, less than a year after gaining its independence by joining French Cameroon, John Ngu Foncha, West Cameroon's Prime Minister at the time, recommended that it was befitting to dedicate West Cameroon's national day to its youth on whom the future State depended. It is not clear if this recommendation was debated in the assembly but it was enforced that same year.
On 26 October 1962, the first "Youth and Sport" day was organised in West Cameroon. There is no doubt that at its inception, enormous importance was attributed to the Youth Day by West Cameroonian politicians, traditional leaders, civil servants and the public.
In a letter addressed to all the Senior District Officers (SDO) of the administrative divisions (counties) in West Cameroon, the Ministry of Education reaffirmed the government's transformation of the national day to the Youth and Sport Day to be celebrated on October 26. Government authorities stipulated that the manner in which the event would be celebrated would differ slightly from the usual National Day.
This is evident from the Bamenda SDO's missive to the organisers of the event in Santa:
"The 26th of October will no longer be known as National Day but Youths' Day. Since it is no longer a National Day, there would therefore be no Guard of Honour. The march-past will be done by the school children only. There would be only one speech to be read and this would be the Prime Minister's speech."
Signed, George Kisob, Senior District Officer, Bamenda Division.
The letter further provided an itemised outline in which it recommended that for the sake of uniformity, the youth day should run from 8:30 am to 6 pm. However, activities consisted of the following; hoisting of the flag and reading of the Prime Minister's speech, a march-past by school children, athletic competitions such as football matches, folklore dances, etc; a similar schedule that had been employed during previous celebrations of the National Day.
While the Government of Southern Cameroons may have instituted a "youth and sports day" on October 26, the transformation of February 11 (not October 26) into the youth day in 1966 by the Ahidjo Government does not in any way refute the anglophone argument that this day was instituted as part of a systematic policy to erase Anglophone history and identity.
So, while this article is interesting from a historical and informative perspective, it completely misses the boat in trying to explain the politics around the institution of Youth day in 1966.
Our good Dr. missed the boat on this one.
Posted by: Manga | Friday, 13 February 2009 at 07:29 PM
The struggle for the liberalisation of the Southern Cameroons should see the possibility of launching a campaign that can make Southern Cameroonian youths to abhor the celebration of 11th as Youth's Day.
This should be a 2010 agenda. I am sure the consequences will be far reaching if we succeed.
Posted by: Bob Bristol | Saturday, 14 February 2009 at 02:52 PM
People in every country receive the business loans in various creditors, because it is comfortable.
Posted by: VictoriaBenton25 | Monday, 05 September 2011 at 08:00 PM
How Cameroonians expect to solve a problem by rendering its contours murky remains a mystery. The problem of Anglophones in Cameroon, especially their marginalization in daily life is well known. Yet those who should stand up and be counted are often the very ones who bring up preposterous arguments to stymie efforts at resolution, in this way, putting what my good friend Amougou aptly calls “un faux problème” as an obstacle.
People who pass for the country’s intellectuals have reduced Anglophones to mere tribes and in so doing, trivialized their plight and rendered it on par with the plight of ordinary tribes. Hear them name the tribes of Cameroon: Bamileke, Bassa, Ewondo, Fufulde, Anglophone, …. Yet it is no secret that at the time Ahmadou Ahidjo and John Ngu Foncha went into the many negotiations to reunite English-speaking Cameroon and French-speaking Cameroon, the two entities were geographically defined and composed, each of many indigenous ethnic groupings called tribes. The English-speaking tribes occupying what was then known as the Southern or British Cameroon gained their independence from British colonial Administration whereas the French-speaking ones, occupying the former East Cameroon received their own independence from France. While the Common Law applied to the former, it was the Napoleonic Law that was practiced in the latter. The adoption of Anglophone for the former and Francophone for the latter was a simple expedient to facilitate reference to them in daily transactions. No doubt individuals in both sectors of the country could command a certain amount of experience in expressing ideas in the other colonial language. The emphasis was on the language of Administration even if everybody did not speak it.
It is discombobulating to hear people today, fifty years down the road, asking the vexing question “But who is Anglophone and who is Francophone?” simply because a few individuals from the French-speaking part of the reunited country can now express themselves in English. This outlandish claim downplays the fact that from the onset of reunification, hordes and hordes of English-speaking Cameroonians from the British Southern Cameroons went to school, studied French as a foreign language and became the first crop of translators and interpreters for Ahmadou Ahidjo and John Ngu Foncha. The list is long – William Mbelem, Francis Yango, Teneng Mongwa, Joseph Chumfong, Peter Vakunte and lots more. Towering above them all was a certain Bernard Nsokika Fonlon who made Cameroon proud by editing the bilingual publication ABBIA in addition to assuming other responsibilities at the top. The late Nzo Ekah Nghaki went to become Secretary-General of the Organization of African Unity, thanks to his flair for expressing himself in English and in French. None of these many Cameroonians of English expression ever doubted his Anglophone identity. So why should the problem crop up simply because some Francophones thought they had become bilingual?
Posted by: J. S. Dinga | Monday, 05 September 2011 at 09:09 PM
@ J. S Dinga,
There is a difference between ethnicity and citizenry. Ethnicity is defined by DNA at birth, while citizenry is defined by choice (after fulfilment of statutory pre-conditions). Thus, you can be ethnically Somalian but a British citizen. If Southern Cameroons were a sovereign state its citizens would be defined by law and not nature; hence the conundrum: who is Anglophone? It`s a universal headache not limited to Cameroon.
I hope this answers your question.
Posted by: limbekid | Wednesday, 07 September 2011 at 03:33 PM
No, it doesn't. And I prefer answers from persons who do not mask their identities.
Posted by: J. S. Dinga | Thursday, 08 September 2011 at 06:51 AM
J.S. Dinga and Limbekid, both locked in this game of arguments-good ones by the way-may do readers a favor if they also provide photos of themselves, rather than throw out these comments about who is masking behind computer screens. Fair game?
Posted by: Siaja Kingsiabe Godlove | Friday, 09 September 2011 at 09:00 AM