That is what we would like, right?
Post a comment
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
« ARROGANT CONTEMPT | Main | Picture of the Day: The Biyas Meet The Obamas »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
This is true, but they can only fight cancer until the cancer grows too quick!
(Which almost always happens.)
Posted by: Michael Downey | Wednesday, 23 September 2009 at 07:37 PM
It is an intriguing thought. The best cancer medicine would be one which mobilizes the body's own defences. Why do the body's defences sometimes not work against cancer in the first place. I think science should be focusing more on what keeps us well than on what makes us sick.
Posted by: Facter | Wednesday, 23 September 2009 at 11:22 PM