Henry Monono
The juju which used to dance behind the house is now dancing in the market place. ….Anonymous.
Since Paul Biya received John Fru Ndi tongues have not stopped wagging. The advent of multi –party politics put Paul and John apart. They were unlike poles that people thought would never meet. The fire brand rhetoric of the SDF at that time was such that it was rumored that the head of state turned down many opportunities to meet the opposition chieftain. The SDF was a hotbed of revolution and its rallying cry of “power to the people” was in sharp contrast to the tame and vapid “oye ye ye ye” of the ruling party.
The greatest strength of John Fru Ndi is the facility with which he connects with the hoi-polio. He speaks the language of the streets and his down to earth style is far removed from the staid and starchy manner of Paul Biya. It is not only in their sense of dress and body language that the two who hold the destiny of the country differ. Biya is an arch conservative His language, manner and attitude are like that of the haughty and uncompromising Bourbons of France who in the words of Talleyrand “had learnt nothing and forgotten nothing”. Biya has been heard to say “If you find yourself on a good road stay there” and “They want change, what do they want to change?” Fru Ndi on the other hand wants to bring the status quo down but it is not apparent if he wants this for altruistic reasons or merely for his own interest in order to perpetrate himself in power like Biya.
Fast forward to Bamenda December 2010 and the lion of Mvomeka came to the den of the lion of Ntarikon and the two men met , held hands, looked into each others eyes sat down and talked. Then they met again at the unity palace over dinner, then they met again at the agric show and Fru Ndi showed Paul Biya his cows. The two who could not meet for twenty years have suddenly met three times in less than forty days. Who has changed or is changing?
In retrospect the two have some common ground. They are both sit-tight autocrats who do not brook any opposition within their parties. The democracy within their parties does not permit any opposition that can threaten their own positions .They are both pseudo-democrats. They have both lost wives and are both monolingual .Biya carries himself like a king and Fru Ndi like a tribal chieftain. They both encourage and court a fanatical following and the mystification or deification of power. They are both farmers, both rich, of the same generation and they have educated their children abroad. We do not know what they may have seen in each other because as the Yoruba’s say, when two witches dance a man does not go there to watch.
This new look Fru Ndi has confused quite a few people. Is the old lion loosing its claws? Is he becoming an establishmentarian? Is he now ready to moderate his stance and to temporize and disengage? Is he tired of fighting from the outside and is he now ready to join the party and eat some soya? Would he join the government if invited? How would this new understanding affect the chairman in the pools? All those who have dined with Biya have got their wings clipped. So if the chairman is coming to the party he better have a long spoon. On the other hand a new middle –of- the- road- image may augur well for the SDF as it would shake off its image of violence and revolution. There is nothing wrong for the leader of opposition and the head of state to talk to each other. There should even be a hotline between the two keeping in mind that the opposition is a shadow government always ready to blow the whistle, raise eyebrows and advance constructive criticisms. It is the SDF parliamentarians who started the Mouchipougate which ushered in the national cleansing now called operation epervier.
Paul and John have been around for too long and if anything is wrong with this country both of them are to blame. They have become unwitting partners in the delicate business of nation building. So the government should give the opposition the respect it deserves and cloth Fru Ndi with all the privileges, prerogatives and rights attendant thereto. The dance must go on.
I would like to know when Mr. Fru Ndi worked outside the system. The writer sounds like he has been operating outside of the country on exile. It is also very foolish that the two men did not meet until recently. I am sure there are as many reasons as there are rumours. Again maybe, as the writer has suggested, they are just two tired old men who have come to terms with the realisation that their time is up. What ever the case - now that they finally met face to face we need to know what they discussed that benefits Cameroonians. Surely something must have come out of this anticipated meeting.
Posted by: Gan Charles | Tuesday, 08 February 2011 at 06:32 PM
All outdate politicians of Biya's Age should be driven out of the political stage of Cameroon. They are bird of the same feathers, atlast NJF has decided to remove his camouflage so he can look really Biya like.All political parties should be disband, the national assembly disolved and all army Generals above 65 send to retirement. The poor and depressed if you don't fight together for your rights you will remain dying everyday...........
Posted by: Felix | Tuesday, 08 February 2011 at 07:36 PM
Nice insight. What I am dying to know is where the SDF's NEC fits into this volteface. Does anyone know?
Posted by: J. S. Dinga | Wednesday, 09 February 2011 at 06:59 AM
Not sure why Fru Ndi meeting Biya is considered a "volte face". The SDF has always expressed its desire to have its chairman meet one-on-one with President Biya but had always been rebuffed. Folks here seem to have forgotten the 1996 SDF-CPDM talks (at a time when the SDF was still a "radical" party) which went on for months and which eventually collapsed because CPDM representatives tried to pull a fast one on the SDF team led by Prof. Kofele-Kale. Those talks were supposed to culminate in a meeting between Fru and Biya.
Also in 1991, at the height of the Ghost Town, the SDF insisted on Biya meeting opposition leaders one-on-one but the regime said Biya would only receive them as a group.
So the Biya-Fru Ndi meetings of 2009/2010 are very consistent with SDF policy going back to 1991.
Analysts should do their homework before talking about a "volte face" or turnaround in SDF policy
BTW, Mr, Gan, Henry Monono has never lived in exile is one of the most prominent Anglophone lawyers in Cameroon. Not every Up Mountain Contributor is an economic refugee like yourself...
Posted by: The Observer | Wednesday, 09 February 2011 at 11:54 AM
Mr Observer,
If you were real and deserve to be heard, you would not be using a pseudonym. That approach already casts doubts on whatever your intervention is.
All the same, I value critiques that can help Cameroon move ahead. If you bothered to weight the entirety of my main point, it was the NEC and its views on this meeting. Obviously the meeting is being tooted around as if Fru Ndi and Biya could meet without the involvement of their leutenants. Secondly, Cameroonians like meetings of this type but better than the meeting itself is the substance that necessitated it as well as the outcome. Obviously it is not asking too much if I or any Cameroonian seeks to know.That's what accountability of a people's representative is all about. Unless and until you can supply this information, it is simple commonsense to let them speak who have the answer.
Thanks for your understanding.
Posted by: J. S. Dinga | Wednesday, 09 February 2011 at 07:22 PM
Similarities between Paul and John well outlined. No matter what. The meeting is good but 20 year too late.
I guess John was waiting to become "much similar to Paul" before they meet. For a 30year old person like me, I hardly fell any difference between 28yrs in power in the government and 20 yrs in power inside opposition circles.
Has anyone ever asked his or her self the question; "If someone fight to remain the leader of the opposition for 20yrs, Presidential candidate since about 20yrs, how long would he want be be president?(remember the constitution has no term limit)"
Okay imagine this scenario, the most god fearing: Paul and John are now talking, they are now even friends, accept as friends never to harm each other no matter who is president, accept on a peacefull, and fair election to allow Cameroonians decide amongst them friends. John wins in a few months. It would be but normal that he anticipates atleast a two term rule i.e. 14yrs meaning till atleast 2025. I just get stomach ache when I imagine just this name "Ni John" in my mind and life till 2025, remembering he has been in my mind for past 20yrs. Ni John for 34yrs, 20yrs as my opposition leader and then atleast 14yrs as president?
PLEASE JOHN AND PAUL THE TWO OF YOU SHOULD TAKE YOUR FRIENDSHIP AND JUST GO AWAY.
Posted by: ErdiSamuels | Friday, 11 February 2011 at 04:17 AM
The Observer - I do not know the Henry Monono you speak of unless you have some quilt of your own - did I say Mr. Fru Ndi?. It is also disingenuous of you to label me as an economic refugee. Please stick to explaining your write up.
Posted by: Gan Charles | Thursday, 17 February 2011 at 09:51 PM
We own John Fru Ndi.
Posted by: maxine | Saturday, 19 February 2011 at 09:40 PM
That was my thought,too.
Posted by: mbt sale | Thursday, 14 July 2011 at 07:00 AM